Performance of wearables and the effect of user behavior in additive manufacturing process

Fashion and Textiles

International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research

Table 8 Influential FDM process parameters on flexural, and impact strengths

AM process /material	Layer thickness (mm)	Air gap (mm)	Part orientation	Raster angle (°)	Postprocess stage	Material quality	Flexural strength (MPa)		Impact strength (KJ/m²)	Ref.
FDM/ABS^a	0.1		Horizontal	45/− 45		Filament dried in vacuo for 4 h at 80 °C	27.3–64.4		4.64–21.51	Huang et al. (2019)
	0.2		Lateral	30/− 60			Difference between max and min		Difference between max and min
	0.3		Vertical	0/90			9.3 for layer thickness		2.39 for layer thickness
							6.1 for raster angle		2.4 for raster angle
							30.8 for part orientation		13.99 for part orientation
FDM				0	Immersion time of 180 s, 300 s, 420 s		38.63–40.65	40.51–46.63		Galantucci et al. (2010)
				30			40.30–42.99	40.88–45.18
				60			41.53–44.35 for untreated	40.26–45.31 for treated
FDM			X	0			30.67–45.20	28.2–45.2		Raut et al. (2014a)
			Y	45			28.01–39.61	27.44–38.62
			X	90			27.44–36.41 for part orientation	30.67–39.61 for raster angle
FDM/ABS^a				45/− 45			33.1		0.77 J	Es-Said et al. (2000)
				0			44.4		4.12 J
				45			31.1		0.78 J
				90			19.6		0.36 J
				45/0			32.2		0.93 J
FDM/ABS^a		− 0.05		0/90			64		40	Dawoud et al. (2016)
				30/− 60			60.7		35.9
				45/− 45			62.2		41.9
				75/− 15			61.9		33.9
		0.05		0/90			42		26.2
				30/− 60			44.2		32.2
				45/− 45			49.8		38
				75/− 15			32		18.2
FDM		0.5					235			Guan et al. (2015)
		0.7					190
		0.9					150
		1.1					130 N
FDM/ABS^a			YZX	0	Chemical untreatment/chemical treatment		49–58	48–54		Garg et al. (2017)
			YXZ	30			49–54	40–44
			ZYZ	60			23–39 for untreatment	18–32 for treatment
			ZYZ	90			23–39 for untreatment	18–32 for treatment