Skip to main content

International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research

Table 5 Co-occurrence matrix of term matrix in the corpus of positive reviews on cycling pants from 2017 to 2020

From: Consumer reviews analysis on cycling pants in online shopping malls using text mining

 

Cost-effective

Size

Satisfaction

Price

Pad

Comfortable

Quality

Reasonable

Hip

Tight

Wear sensation

Textile

Good

Cost-effective

975

119

73

85

92

48

50

42

28

32

26

37

28

Size

119

971

92

97

103

55

75

63

50

88

34

49

25

Satisfaction

73

92

728

125

72

25

75

23

18

18

28

33

9

Price

85

97

125

698

86

39

146

58

28

18

25

35

22

Pad

92

103

72

86

544

58

40

45

79

33

31

50

23

Comfortable

48

55

25

39

58

432

14

7

25

15

21

18

13

Quality

50

75

75

146

40

14

393

35

8

14

15

15

22

Reasonable

42

63

23

58

45

7

35

290

16

28

18

19

1

Hip

28

50

18

28

79

25

8

16

258

16

11

10

2

Tight

32

88

18

18

33

15

14

28

16

223

4

19

7

Wear sensation

26

34

28

25

31

21

15

18

11

4

221

18

16

Textile

37

49

33

35

50

18

15

19

10

19

18

205

9

Good

28

25

9

22

23

13

22

1

2

7

16

9

188

Riding

35

32

25

29

30

30

14

16

24

6

8

8

5

Design

31

31

30

37

33

12

22

18

10

7

17

27

6

Thigh

21

55

22

17

32

14

8

15

20

27

5

14

3

Cheap

21

20

19

71

22

6

19

7

7

6

5

5

6

Recommendation

43

25

20

20

31

10

9

12

8

8

3

9

0

Larger size

25

52

22

12

7

9

16

11

5

21

2

5

2

Bib short

27

33

13

31

30

14

13

15

9

11

7

10

7

Pretty

9

18

9

8

13

11

3

2

6

5

4

6

2

Too tight

4

14

8

6

12

10

4

4

4

4

2

7

7

Fit

10

24

9

10

12

13

6

5

6

6

4

10

4

Wear

11

12

16

11

13

18

8

9

7

4

8

4

3

Painful

10

9

4

8

18

6

2

5

60

2

2

2

1

Finishing

17

22

9

19

13

3

9

9

1

2

3

13

2

 

Riding

Design

Thigh

Cheap

Recommendation

Larger size

Bib short

Pretty

Too tight

Fit

Wear

Painful

Finishing

Cost-effective

35

31

21

21

43

25

27

9

4

10

11

10

17

Size

32

31

55

20

25

52

33

18

14

24

12

9

22

Satisfaction

25

30

22

19

20

22

13

9

8

9

16

4

9

Price

29

37

17

71

20

12

31

8

6

10

11

8

19

Pad

30

33

32

22

31

7

30

13

12

12

13

18

13

Comfortable

30

12

14

6

10

9

14

11

10

13

18

6

3

Quality

14

22

8

19

9

16

13

3

4

6

8

2

9

Reasonable

16

18

15

7

12

11

15

2

4

5

9

5

9

Hip

24

10

20

7

8

5

9

6

4

6

7

60

1

Tight

6

7

27

6

8

21

11

5

4

6

4

2

2

Wear sensation

8

17

5

5

3

2

7

4

2

4

8

2

3

Textile

8

27

14

5

9

5

10

6

7

10

4

2

13

Good

5

6

3

6

0

2

7

2

7

4

3

1

2

Riding

185

11

10

7

10

5

10

1

1

7

16

11

2

Design

11

165

11

5

4

4

5

22

3

3

3

3

6

Thigh

10

11

162

3

4

9

10

3

6

1

2

3

6

Cheap

7

5

3

161

6

3

8

3

2

0

0

2

7

Recommendation

10

4

4

6

156

15

5

3

3

4

4

4

2

Larger size

5

4

9

3

15

139

3

1

1

4

3

1

3

Bib short

10

5

10

8

5

3

123

3

7

1

4

3

3

Pretty

1

22

3

3

3

1

3

119

4

6

1

1

2

Too tight

1

3

6

2

3

1

7

4

95

1

1

1

1

Fit

7

3

1

0

4

4

1

6

1

94

3

1

2

Wear

16

3

2

0

4

3

4

1

1

3

85

5

1

Painful

11

3

3

2

4

1

3

1

1

1

5

81

0

Finishing

2

6

6

7

2

3

3

2

1

2

1

0

66