Skip to main content

International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research

Table 3 F-values and means for perceived attractiveness acquired from ANOVA

From: How different shades of red T-shirts enhance the perceived attractiveness of Asian women in digital photographs

  

Tones of red

 
  

No T-shirt

Low chroma/high value

Low chroma/medium value

High chroma/medium value

Low chroma/low value

df

F

Type 1

Male

2.22 ± .73c

2.57 ± .85b

2.74 ± .80ab

2.75 ± .92a

2.54 ± .90b

4, 506

6.549***

Female

2.76 ± .83c

2.92 ± .81bc

3.06 ± .83ab

3.19 ± .81a

2.99 ± .85ab

4, 562

4.224**

Total

2.50 ± .83c

2.76 ± .85b

2.77 ± .90b

2.98 ± .89a

2.91 ± .83ab

 

9.733***

Type 2

Male

2.49 ± .74b

2.53 ± .90b

2.62 ± .94b

2.94 ± .88a

2.63 ± .94b

4, 504

4.127**

Female

2.71 ± .72b

2.77 ± .87b

2.73 ± .89b

3.06 ± .85a

2.80 ± .87b

4, 563

3.265*

Total

2.60 ± .74b

2.66 ± .89b

2.68 ± .92b

3.00 ± .86a

2.72b ± .91

 

7.170***

Type 3

Male

2.25 ± .75c

2.63 ± .82ab

2.47 ± .89bc

2.83 ± .1.03a

2.53 ± .78b

4, 504

6.192***

Female

2.68 ± .74c

2.91 ± .84b

3.00 ± .78ab

3.14 ± .81a

2.94 ± .80ab

4, 563

5.116***

Total

2.47 ± .77c

2.78 ± .84b

2.75 ± .87b

2.99 ± .93a

2.75 ± .82b

 

10.006***

Type 4

Male

2.22 ± .76b

2.53 ± .80a

2.28 ± .80b

2.63 ± .84a

2.28 ± .78b

4, 506

5.184***

Female

2.84 ± .85a

2.42 ± .86b

2.57 ± .83b

2.56 ± .78b

2.63 ± .82ab

4, 562

3.946**

Total

2.55 ± .86

2.47 ± .83

2.43 ± .83

2.59 ± .81

2.46 ± .82

 

1.451

  1. Bold emphasis means the significantly highest average of perceived attractiveness
  2. ANOVA: analysis of variance. Perceived attractiveness scale: 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Means were ranked by a, b, and c, ordered by the magnitude of the value
  3. *p ≤ .01, **p ≤ .001, ***p ≤ .0001