Fashion and Textiles

International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research

Table 4 Linear regression using product attractiveness and SAM scores to predict agreement levels with each of the functional and aesthetic design attributes of the product being the reason to choose particular bra as favorite

From: Aesthetic and functional bra attributes as emotional triggers

Predictors	Functional attributes
	Closure type		Wings reinforcement		Underwire		Underband width		Band width		Straps		Model
	β	t	β	t	β	t	β	t	β	t	β	t	β	t
(Constant)		4.34**		1.80^†		6.35**		2.30*		.17		− .49		3.53*
Attractiveness	.49	5.58**	.30	3.45*	− .04	− .56	− .32	− 3.69**	.13	1.61	− .01	− .15	− .13	− 1.58
Arousal	.01	.07	− .14	− 1.55	− .15	− 1.78	− .06	− .66	− .29	− 3.47*	.12	1.27	.10	1.15
Valence	− .36	− 3.57**	− .10	− .99	− .58	− 6.37**	− .06	− .59	.20	2.09*	.07	.67	− .28	− 3.01*
Dominance	− .11	− 1.47	.12	1.49	.23	3.35*	.36	4.66**	.11	1.58	.40	5.06**	.37	5.10**
R²	.15		.13		.31		.15		.28		.13		.26
F	8.91**		7.76**		21.72**		8.65**		18.51**		7.72**		17.09**

	Aesthetic attributes
	Prints		Tissue/texture		Cleavage shape		Embroidery		Filling		Push up		Color
	β	t	β	t	β	t	β	t	β	t	β	t	β	t
(Constant)		5.80**		2.73*		10.08**		4.81**		4.36		.18		2.34*
Attractiveness	.55	7.80**	− .04	− .46	− .01	− .17	− .27	− 3.75**	.00	.03	− .17	− 1.80^†	.08	1.03
Arousal	− .06	− .81	.02	.19	− .36	− 4.46**	.32	4.28**	− .22	− 2.27*	.14	1.45	− .01	− .08
Valence	− .68	− 8.36**	− .15	− 1.42	− .69	− 7.58**	− .18	− 2.17*	− .35	− 3.33*	.15	1.326	− .43	− 5.02**
Dominance	.15	2.35*	.26	3.22*	.17	2.42*	− .09	− 1.31	.11	1.40	.10	1.144	.48	7.30**
R²	.45		.07		.32		.41		.07		.01		.40
F	37.31**		4.58*		22.29**		33.01**		4.56*		1.32		30.98**

^†p < .10 and ** p < .001 and * p < .05

Back to article page