Skip to main content

International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research

Table 5 Hypotheses testing results

From: A cross-cultural study of the proximity of clothing to self between millennial women in South Korea and Mongolia

 

Hypotheses

Result

Correlation between cultural values and PCS

H1. Individualism may positively influence PCS1

reject

H2. Individualism value may negatively influence PCS2 (a) and PCS3 (b)

(a) support

(b) support

H3. Power distance value may positively influence PCS2 (a) and PCS3 (b)

(a) reject

(b) reject

H4. Masculinity value may positively influence PCS2 (a) and PCS3 (b)

(a) reject

(b) reject

H5. Uncertainty avoidance value may positively influence PCS2 (a) and PCS3 (b)

(a) support

(b) support

H6: Indulgence vs Restraint value may positively influence PCS2 (a) and PCS3 (b)

(a) support

(b) reject

Comparison between countries

H7: The country with higher individualism may have lower PCS1 (a), PCS2 (b) and PCS3 (c)

(a) support

(b) reject

(c) support

H8: The country with a higher power distance may have higher PCS2 (a) and PCS3 (b)

N/A

H9: The country with higher masculinity may have higher PCS2 (a) and PCS3 (b)

N/A

H10: The country with higher uncertainty avoidance may have higher PCS2 (a) and PCS3 (b)

N/A

H11: The country with higher indulgence may have higher PCS2 (a) and PCS3 (b)

(a) support

(b) reject

H12: The country may moderate the relationship between cultural values and proximity of clothing to self

reject

  1. N/A not applicable (H8-10 could not be verified as both countries’ PDI, MAS and UAI are not statistically different)