International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research
Hypotheses | Path Coefficient | t-value | Results | f square |
---|---|---|---|---|
H1a: Optimism → Perceived ease of use | .61 | 15.19*** | Supported | 0.42 |
H1b: Optimism → Perceived usefulness | .35 | 6.75*** | Supported | 0.15 |
H1c: Optimism → Perceived enjoyment | .63 | 15.26*** | Supported | 0.53 |
H1d: Optimism → Perceived fit | .51 | 9.44*** | Supported | 0.30 |
H2a: Innovativeness → Perceived ease of use | .18 | 3.99*** | Supported | 0.03 |
H2b: Innovativeness → Perceived usefulness | .09 | 2.07* | Supported | 0.01 |
H2c: Innovativeness → Perceived enjoyment | .22 | 5.21*** | Supported | 0.06 |
H2d: Innovativeness → Perceived fit | .30 | 6.10*** | Supported | 0.10 |
H3a: Discomfort → Perceived ease of use | − .10 | 2.26* | Supported | 0.01 |
H3b: Discomfort → Perceived usefulness | − .13 | 3.07** | Supported | 0.03 |
H3c: Discomfort → Perceived enjoyment | − .13 | 3.05** | Supported | 0.02 |
H3d: Discomfort → Perceived fit | − .03 | 0.67 | Rejected | 0.00 |
H4a: Insecurity → Perceived ease of use | .07 | 1.60 | Rejected | 0.01 |
H4b: Insecurity → Perceived usefulness | .04 | 1.24 | Rejected | 0.00 |
H4c: Insecurity → Perceived enjoyment | .05 | 1.39 | Rejected | 0.01 |
H4d: Insecurity → Perceived fit | .04 | 1.02 | Rejected | 0.00 |
H5: Perceived ease of use → Perceived usefulness | .48 | 10.11*** | Supported | 0.35 |
H6: Perceived ease of use → Attitude | .02 | 0.45 | Rejected | 0.00 |
H7: Perceived usefulness → Attitude | .22 | 3.68*** | Supported | 0.04 |
H8: Perceived enjoyment → Attitude | .43 | 6.51*** | Supported | 0.12 |
H9: Perceived fit → Attitude | .22 | 3.92*** | Supported | 0.06 |
H10: Attitude → Purchase intention | .84 | 51.25*** | Supported | 2.66 |
Purchase experience → Attitude | .12 | 2.13* |  | 0.01 |
Purchase experience → Purchase intention | .22 | 3.98*** |  | 0.03 |