Skip to main content

International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research

Table 3 Comparison of the parameters indicating the cooling performance of each cooling vest during three thermal manikin test methods

From: Cooling performance measurements of different types of cooling vests using thermal manikin

Test methods

Parameters

ACV

LCV

EVAP

PCM

Hybrid

No_SWT

:35°C, 35%RH, Non-sweating thermal manikin

Pmax (W)

17.9

85.6

46.6

56.7

73.6

Pavg (W)

1.0

35.6

25.3

9.6

25.2

AUC (W·h)

2.7

256.6

151.8

52.6

123.6

Tc (min)

5

291

283

89

193

SWT_HD

:35°C, 40%RH, Sweating thermal manikin

Pmax (W)

135.6

117.0

74.7

97.7

99.5

Pavg’ (W)

114.8

111.1

N.A

86.1

84.2

Pbase (W)

29.0

34.4

49.6

46.3

46.6

Peff (W)

85.8

76.8

N.A

39.8

37.6

Tc’ (min)

 > 480

172

0

8

11

SWT_HH

:35°C, 70%RH, Sweating thermal manikin

Pmax (W)

67.2

105.1

55.6

77.7

86.3

Pavg’ (W)

60.5

93.4

N.A

66.5

74.1

Pbase (W)

18.0

18.2

26.5

25.0

26.4

Peff (W)

42.5

75.1

N.A

41.6

47.7

Tc’ (min)

114

186

0

10

14

  1. ACV air-cooling vest; LCV liquid-cooling vest; EVAP evaporative cooling vest; PCM cooling vest with PCM inserts;  Hybrid evaporative cooling vest with PCM inserts; Pmax maximal cooling rate; Pavg average cooling rate throughout the 8-h measurement; Tc cooling duration when cooling power ≥ 20 W/m2; AUC area under the curve, indicating cooling capacity; Pavg average cooling rate during Tc’; Peff effective cooling rate (Pavg’ – Pbase); Pbase: baseline power input measured with cooling vests not activated; Tc duration of cooling calculated until Peff has decreased to 50W; N.A. not available