- Open Access
Preparation of anti-bacterial cellulose fiber via electrospinning and crosslinking with β-cyclodextrin
© Kang et al. 2015
- Received: 20 November 2014
- Accepted: 12 June 2015
- Published: 14 July 2015
In the study, we successfully produced electrospun cellulose fibers crosslinked with β-CD. For electrospinning, cellulose was dissolve in 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate and DMF was added to the prepared solution for better spinnability. The prepared cellulose fiber was immersed in the solution containing β-CD, crosslinking agent and sodium hypophosphite. In order to understand the effect of a crosslinking agent, two different types of the agents, BTCA (1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxylic acid) and citric acid with various concentrations were used for cross-linking. The crosslinking degree was increased with the concentration of the crosslinking agents, for the both agents. The cross-linked web changed into membrane like morphology when the concentration of the cross-linking agent was higher than 5 wt%. The concentration of crosslinking agent also gave influence on the crystallinity, the thermal property and the antibacterial activity of fibers. Due to the cross-linking the crystallinity was decreased. The cross-linked fiber showed selective bacterial behavior according to the bacterial strain and the cross-linking agent.
- Ionic liquid
Cyclodextrins (CDs) are doughnut-shaped oligosaccharides consisting of α(1,4)-linked glucopyranose. Due to their amphiphilicity, CDs are expected to be applied in many areas such as drug delivery, chromatography, selective removal and solubility enhancement (Araki and Ito 2007; Del Valle 2004; Giuffrida et al. 2006; Hedges 1998; Naidoo et al. 2004; Szejtli 1998).
Cyclodextrins are found as many different forms depending on the number of glucose units. Three of the most important cyclodextrins are α-, β-, and γ-CDs which are consisting of 6, 7 and 8 glucose units, respectively. Among them, β-CD takes more attentions due to its relatively simple manufacturing process and high productivity (Del Valle 2004). As a carrier of antibacterial agent or drug, β-CD is one of the most effective materials. Sun et al. (2011) studied the in vitro antibacterial activity of cyclodextrin-drug complexes using β-cyclodextrin and 2-hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin. The complexation of the antibacterial drug with the CDs improved the antibacterial activity by steady-state release of the drug. While the cyclodextrin–drug complexes were still studied by many researchers, the antibacterial activity of pure β-CD itself has not been intensively investigated.
Recently, many researchers are interested in β-CD nanofiber because it can dramatically improve desirable properties by increase of the specific surface area (Fong et al. 1999; Huang et al. 2003; Li and Xia 2004; Li et al. 2005; Schiffman and Schauer 2008; Zhang et al. 2005). However, the molecular interactions of small molecules including β-CD are not strong enough to prevent stream breakage in uniaxial deformation during spinning. In order to produce nanofiber, β-CD needs to be mixed with carrier polymers such as PEO (Uyar and Besenbacher 2009), PAN (Wang et al. 2012), PMMA (Uyar et al. 2010), PVA (Zhang et al. 2011) etc. The mixed solutions were successfully electrospun into sub-micron size fibers. However, this method has several drawbacks with respect to processing and performance. The first drawback is difficult to select an optimal solvent which can dissolve both polymer and β-CD with proper concentration. The polymer also needs to be thermodynamically comparable with β-CD in order to guarantee good spinnability. Plus, it is difficult to control the location of β-CD on the fiber surface for better functionality.
Recent researches showed the possibility that small molecules such as phospholipid and gemini surfactant could be electrospun into nanofiber when the molecules have entangled micelle networking (Cashion et al. 2009; McKee et al. 2006). The strong hydrogen boding induced by many –OH groups in β-CD make the molecules possible to form networking structure similarly to phospholipid and gemini surfactant. However, comparing to α- and γ-CDs, β-CD has very poor solubility in conventional solvents due to the local water held in the cavity and around the molecules (Naidoo et al. 2004). The local water makes β-CD rigid macro-cyclic compound, which is not easily accommodated into conventional solvent system (Naidoo et al. 2004). This poor solubility of β-CD did not allow the direct dissolution for electrospinning. To improve the solubility, the external hydrophilic groups are chemically modified into hydrophobic groups such as hydroxypropyl and methyl groups (Celebioglu and Uyar 2010, 2011, 2012; Manasco et al. 2012). The modified CD showed better solubility and successfully electrospun into nanofiber. Recently our research group reported direct dissolution of unmodified β-CD using ionic liquid and successful electrospinning of the prepared solution (Ahn et al. 2013). However, the electrospun β-CD was mechanically weak and brittle for further applications.
To overcome the weaknesses of the two methods (spinning with carrier polymer and direct spinning), we cross-linked β-CD on the surface of electrospun cellulose fiber. The cross-linked fiber is mechanically acceptable and has selective anti-bacterial properties, which would be beneficial for biomedical applications due to its biocompatibility as well as biodegradability.
β-CD (Mw 1,134.99, purity >95%) was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Company (Japan). Cellulose (DP 1100) for the study was obtained as powder from Hyosung Co. (Korea). Ionic liquid (1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate) and dimethylformamide (DMF) were purchased from BASF (Germany) and Daejung Chemicals & Metals Co. (Korea), respectively. 1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxylic acid (BTCA, 98%), citric acid (>99.5%) and sodium hypophosphite (>98%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All chemicals and materials were used without further purification.
The solutions for electrospinning were prepared by dissolving cellulose in the ionic liquid. The concentration of cellulose was kept as 12 wt%. DMF was added to the solution to improve the spinnability (Ahn et al. 2012). The ratio of ionic liquid to DMF was fixed at 5:5.
The prepared solutions were electrospun using a syringe type electrospinning apparatus on to a rotating wired cylinder. The tip was a 20 G stainless steel needle having 0.60 mm inner diameter. In the all experiments, the applied voltage and TCD (tip-do-collector distance) were 30 kV and 15 cm, respectively. The air pressure was fixed as 0.1 MPa.
The electrospun cellulose was immersed in ethanol at 4°C for 2 h to remove ionic liquid and DMF. The coagulated fiber was dried at ambient condition for a day.
Solution preparation conditions
The morphologies of the electrospun fibers were observed using scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM S-4700, Hitachi, Japan). The cross-linking in the fibers were examined using FT-IR (FT-IR, Nicolet 6700, USA) with ATR Acc. (window ZnSe/diamond). The numbers of scanning, resolution and wavenumber range were 32, 8 and 1,200–1,800 cm−1, respectively. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using High Resolution XRD (Ultima IV, Rigaku, Japan) to investigate the micro-structure. The basis for the equation of the crystallinity degree was calculated using a computer program (ProFit V1.0, Philips Electronics N.V, Netherlands). The thermal properties were evaluated by TGA (Q500, TA Instruments, USA). The TGA curves were obtained under a nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate of 10°C/min until 600°C.
Antibacterial susceptibility test
The bacterial strains used in this study, Staphylococcus aureus KCTC 1621 (Gram positive) and Escherichia coli KCTC 1682 (Gram negative) were obtained from the Korean Collection for Type Culture (KCTC; Daejeon, Korea). After the pre-cultured bacteria cell for 18 h was adjusted according to 0.5 McFarland standards, the bacteria cell was spread onto Nutrient broth agar in a Petridish (Cauwelier et al. 2004; Pervin et al. 2012). The cross-linked cellulose web was cut into 10 mm squares and was located on the petridish. The petridish was incubated at 37°C for 24 h and the bacterial activity was observed.
The characteristic peak (1,727 cm−1) was increased as the concentration of the cross-linking agent increased. For the case of citric acid, the peak was slightly increased with the concentration of citric acid. For the case of BTCA, however, the peak was considerably increased with the acid concentration and was larger comparing to the citric acid case at higher concentration. This indicates that BTCA is more effective for cross-linking than citric acid, which is coincident to the result of previous studies (Chung et al. 1998; El-Tahlawy et al. 2005).
Degree of crystallinity
Degree of crystallinity (%)
BTCA 2 wt%
BTCA 5 wt%
BTCA 8 wt%
CA 2 wt%
CA 5 wt%
CA 8 wt%
As shown in Table 2, the crystallinity was decreased as the concentration of the cross-linking agent increased. When cellulose was cross-linked with β-CD, the intermolecular hydrogen bonding became weaker because of the substitution of hydroxyl group with β-CD. At the same time, the cellulose chain-to-chain distance increased due to the attached molecules. As a result, the more cross-linked cellulose showed lower crystallinity due to the higher concentration of the crosslinking agent.
As shown in the figure, the antibacterial effect toward Gram positive S. aureus was observed with the increase of citric acid concentration. However, when the cross-linked cellulose fibers with BTCA were applied, no effect has been noticed on the tested bacterial strain. Especially, in the case of Gram negative bacteria, E. coli, no antibacterial activity effect was observed on most cellulose fibers. Although it is still not known why the this difference in the antibacterial susceptibility was originated, the result may be due to the difference in release rate of toxic materials (i.e. cross-linking agents) form the fabric, differences of membrane structure of bacterial strains, or susceptibility against antibacterial materials released from the fabric (Gupta 2011; Kim et al. 1997; Orhan et al. 2009).
β-CD was successfully cross-linked with electrospun cellulose fibers using BTCA and citric acid. As the concentration of crosslinking agent increased, more β-CD was cross-linked with the cellulose fiber. It resulted in lower crystallinity due to β-CD cross-linked to cellulose and smaller secondary bonding between the polymer chains. The cross-linked fibers show selective antibacterial effect according to type of cross-linking agent and bacteria.
The authors in the article contributed as follows; Mr. WK electrospun cellulose nanofibers and cross-linked CD with the fiber and Mr. YS characterize the CD attached cellulose nanofibers. Drs. YC and HJK evaluated the antibacterial properties. HK, myself is a corresponding author who designed and controlled the whole research and prepared the manuscript. All authors agree to the publication of the article on Fashion and Textile Engineering. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This work was supported by the Industrial strategic technology development program funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MI, Korea) (10041237). This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2012R1A1A2008620).
Compliance with ethical guidelines
Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Ahn, Y., Hu, D.-H., Hong, J. H., Lee, S. H., Kim, H. J., & Kim, H. (2012). Effect of co-solvent on the spinnability and properties of electrospun cellulose nanofiber. Carbohydrate Polymers, 89(2), 340–345.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ahn, Y., Kang, Y., Ku, M., Yang, Y.-H., Jung, S., & Kim, H. (2013). Preparation of β-cyclodextrin fiber using electrospinning. RSC Advances, 3(35), 14983–14987.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Araki, J., & Ito, K. (2007). Recent advances in the preparation of cyclodextrin-based polyrotaxanes and their applications to soft materials. Soft Matter, 3(12), 1456–1473.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cashion, M. P., Li, X., Geng, Y., Hunley, M. T., & Long, T. E. (2009). Gemini surfactant electrospun membranes. Langmuir, 26(2), 678–683.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cauwelier, B., Gordts, B., Descheemaecker, P., & Van Landuyt, H. (2004). Evaluation of a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin (30 μg) for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 23(5), 389–392.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Celebioglu, A., & Uyar, T. (2010). Cyclodextrin nanofibers by electrospinning. Chemical Communications, 46(37), 6903–6905.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Celebioglu, A., & Uyar, T. (2011). Electrospinning of polymer-free nanofibers from cyclodextrin inclusion complexes. Langmuir, 27(10), 6218–6226.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Celebioglu, A., & Uyar, T. (2012). Electrospinning of nanofibers from non-polymeric systems: Polymer-free nanofibers from cyclodextrin derivatives. Nanoscale, 4(2), 621–631.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen, Z., Wang, L., & Jiang, H. (2012). The effect of procyanidine crosslinking on the properties of the electrospun gelatin membranes. Biofabrication, 4(3), 035007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chung, Y.-S., Lee, K.-K., & Kim, J.-W. (1998). Durable press and antimicrobial finishing of cotton fabrics with a citric acid and chitosan treatment. Textile Research Journal, 68(10), 772–775.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Del Valle, E. M. (2004). Cyclodextrins and their uses: A review. Process Biochemistry, 39(9), 1033–1046.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- El-Tahlawy, K. F., El-Bendary, M. A., Elhendawy, A. G., & Hudson, S. M. (2005). The antimicrobial activity of cotton fabrics treated with different crosslinking agents and chitosan. Carbohydrate Polymers, 60(4), 421–430.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fong, H., Chun, I., & Reneker, D. (1999). Beaded nanofibers formed during electrospinning. Polymer, 40(16), 4585–4592.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Giuffrida, S., Ventimiglia, G., Petralia, S., Conoci, S., & Sortino, S. (2006). Facile light-triggered one-step synthesis of small and stable platinum nanoparticles in an aqueous medium from a β-cyclodextrin host–guest inclusion complex. Inorganic Chemistry, 45(2), 508–510.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gupta, R. S. (2011). Origin of diderm (Gram-negative) bacteria: antibiotic selection pressure rather than endosymbiosis likely led to the evolution of bacterial cells with two membranes. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 100(2), 171–182.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hedges, A. R. (1998). Industrial applications of cyclodextrins. Chemical Reviews, 98(5), 2035–2044.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang, Z.-M., Zhang, Y.-Z., Kotaki, M., & Ramakrishna, S. (2003). A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Composites science and technology, 63(15), 2223–2253.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim, C. H., Kim, S. Y., & Choi, K. S. (1997). Synthesis and antibacterial activity of water-soluble chitin derivatives. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 8(5), 319–325.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li, M., Mondrinos, M. J., Gandhi, M. R., Ko, F. K., Weiss, A. S., & Lelkes, P. I. (2005). Electrospun protein fibers as matrices for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 26(30), 5999–6008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li, D., & Xia, Y. (2004). Electrospinning of nanofibers: Reinventing the wheel? Advanced Materials, 16(14), 1151–1170.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu, H., Zhen, M., & Wu, R. (2007). Ionic-strength-and pH-responsive poly [acrylamide-co-(maleic acid)] hydrogel nanofibers. Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, 208(8), 874–880.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Manasco, J. L., Saquing, C. D., Tang, C., & Khan, S. A. (2012). Cyclodextrin fibers via polymer-free electrospinning. RSC Advances, 2(9), 3778–3784.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McKee, M. G., Layman, J. M., Cashion, M. P., & Long, T. E. (2006). Phospholipid nonwoven electrospun membranes. Science, 311(5759), 353–355.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Medronho, B., Andrade, R., Vivod, V., Ostlund, A., Miguel, M., Lindman, B., et al. (2013). Cyclodextrin-grafted cellulose: Physico-chemical characterization. Carbohydrate Polymers, 93(1), 324–330.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Naidoo, K. J., Chen, J. Y.-J., Jansson, J. L., Widmalm, G., & Maliniak, A. (2004). Molecular properties related to the anomalous solubility of β-cyclodextrin. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 108(14), 4236–4238.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Orhan, M., Kut, D., & Gunesoglu, C. (2009). Improving the antibacterial activity of cotton fabrics finished with triclosan by the use of 1, 2, 3, 4-butanetetracarboxylic acid and citric acid. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 111(3), 1344–1352.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pervin, R., Sabrin, F., Billah, M. M., Islam, K. D., Elmezughi, J., & Shilpi, J. A. (2012). Antibacterial and cytotoxic activity of Meyna spinosa Roxb. Stem. Turkish Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 9(2), 225–230.Google Scholar
- Reddy, N., & Yang, Y. (2010). Citric acid cross-linking of starch films. Food Chemistry, 118(3), 702–711.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schiffman, J. D., & Schauer, C. L. (2008). A review: Electrospinning of biopolymer nanofibers and their applications. Polymer Reviews, 48(2), 317–352.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun, H.-K., Seshadri, M., Lingard, S., Monaghan, W., Faoagali, J., Chan, E., et al. (2011). Antibacterial activity of β-cyclodextrin and 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin trimethoprim complexes. American Journal of Microbiology, 2(1), 1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Szejtli, J. (1998). Introduction and general overview of cyclodextrin chemistry. Chemical Reviews, 98(5), 1743–1754.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uyar, T., & Besenbacher, F. (2009). Electrospinning of cyclodextrin functionalized polyethylene oxide (PEO) nanofibers. European Polymer Journal, 45(4), 1032–1037.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uyar, T., Havelund, R., Nur, Y., Balan, A., Hacaloglu, J., Toppare, L., et al. (2010). Cyclodextrin functionalized poly (methyl methacrylate)(PMMA) electrospun nanofibers for organic vapors waste treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 365(1), 409–417.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang, S., Bai, J., Li, C., & Zhang, J. (2012). Functionalization of electrospun β-cyclodextrin/polyacrylonitrile (PAN) with silver nanoparticles: Broad-spectrum antibacterial property. Applied Surface Science, 261, 499–503.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang, C. Q., Chen, D., Guan, J., & He, Q. (2010). Cross-linking cotton cellulose by the combination of maleic acid and sodium hypophosphite. 1. Fabric wrinkle resistance. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 49(18), 8325–8332.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, W., Chen, M., & Diao, G. (2011). Electrospinning β-cyclodextrin/poly (vinyl alcohol) nanofibrous membrane for molecular capture. Carbohydrate Polymers, 86(3), 1410–1416.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, Y., Ouyang, H., Lim, C. T., Ramakrishna, S., & Huang, Z. M. (2005). Electrospinning of gelatin fibers and gelatin/PCL composite fibrous scaffolds. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B, Applied Biomaterials, 72(1), 156–165.View ArticleGoogle Scholar