The purpose of this study is to propose the most suitable sewing method to produce wetsuits using neoprene fabric. To construct a sewing method sample using neoprene fabric, the samples were prepared using two thicknesses (1.5 t and 3 t) of neoprene fabric. Sewing techniques comprised 10 different methods. The respective seam strengths (KSK 0530) and water resistance (KSK ISO 811) of each sample were measured. The results from the tests conducted using 10 sewing methods revealed that the seam strength of 466.7 N was the highest in the prototype constructed using zigzag and flatlock stitches on 1.5 t. The other samples had seam strengths of approximately 400 N, except for that sewn with straight stitch (113.3 N). For 3 t, the sample sewn using zigzag and flatlock stitches with seam sealing (653.3 N) had the highest strength, and the remaining samples had seam strengths of approximately 630 N, except the sample sewn with straight stitch (164.6 N). Significant factors affecting the seam strength were fabric thickness and the sewing method. Meanwhile, glue and blind stitch with seam sealing had the highest value for water resistance: 414.4 mH2O for 1.5 t and 987.6 mH2O for 3 t. The lowest values were revealed in samples sewn with zigzag and flatlock stitch 14.4 mH2O for 1.5 t and overlock stitch 13.3 mH2O for 3 t. Significant factors affecting water resistance were whether seam sealing was attached and the sewing method used. The expected result of this study, which tests the properties of two neoprene fabric thicknesses with 10 sewing methods, is the suggestion of the most appropriate sewing method for use in the production of a wet suit.
The sea occupies three quarters of the earth upon which we live, and many creatures live in harmony in its environment. With the improvement of living standards today, a large proportion of the population participates in marine sports. The popularity of scuba diving is steadily increasing every year (Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism 2016).
The sea is a completely different environment for humans. It is difficult to perform any activity without special equipment for diving. Human beings live and breathe on land, and when they enter the water, there are many differences in terms of the (high) pressure level, (low) temperature, and the movement of the human body. Even in summer, the water temperature in the sea is much cooler than that of the water on the surface. In addition, layers called thermocline form where warm surface water and cold water meet and suddenly become cold during a diver’s descent. Therefore, to ensure the stability of the diver’s body temperature, a proper wetsuit is necessary (Jung 2005). Among the active equipment of a diver, clothing is that which is used closest to the human body and cannot be overlooked. When a diver is wearing a wetsuit, the suit is in close contact with the water, and a small amount is absorbed through the neck, wrists, and the zipper; because the diver is wearing the wetsuit, the extent to which the water comes into contact with the skin is minimized. Therefore, even if a certain amount of water enters the wetsuit, it warms to match the diver’s body temperature, helps maintain the body temperature to some extent, and prevents the rapid loss of heat. However, when the wetsuit is large and loose, a large amount of water seeps into the wetsuit during the diving activity, and the diver’s body warmth decreases. Conversely, a wetsuit that is too small may be uncomfortable during movement or respiration. Also, in severe cases, compression or carotid compression may occur (Jung 1999; Kim 2012).
To date, research on wetsuits has been carried out by Kim and Kwon (2000), who have focused on the thermal insulation performance of skin scuba clothing materials; they reported that the thicker neoprene most commonly used as the fabric for wetsuits can maintain warmth during diving activities due to its superior insulation. Choi and Jeong (2009) analyzed the actual state of production and consumer satisfaction with men’s skin scuba suits and found that the level of satisfaction with the warmth and elasticity of the material was high but in terms of pattern design, satisfaction was low. Green sportswear users are expected to purchase more green products, which means that apparel retailers that can meet customers’ values and desire for more satisfying sportswear products should be established (Nam et al. 2017). Choi (2011a) developed a scuba pattern for men using 3D scan data, and also studied the pattern reduction rate of wetsuits for men in their 30 s (Choi 2011b). Wetsuits are constructed with neoprene fabrics that can stretch and are thick enough to prevent tearing due to contact with rocks or shells during use. However, no research has been conducted on the proper sewing methods for these special types of apparel.
Neoprene fabric comprises soft synthetic rubber foam that can be manufactured to be thicker than other plain fabrics, so it can provide protection from natural injury while also providing heat insulation and buoyancy. In order to sew neoprene fabric to make wetsuit with strong seam strength, it need to special sewing methods. Seam strength is increase as stitch density is increase but up to some extent, after that the strength of seam decrease (Nazakat et al. 2014). A wetsuit is composed of several panels in one garment that cling to the body during dynamic activity. Neoprene fabrics provide good stretch in all four directions. Therefore, the sewing methods required for wetsuits are different than those used in conventional garment construction. As shown in Table 1, overlock stitching, flatlock stitching, and glue and blind stitching methods are generally used for fabric that is less than 3 mm thick; for fabric that is more than 3 mm thick, the glue and blind stitching method is used (Wetsuit Buying Guide 2018). However, until now, there has been a lack of research on the optimal sewing methods for seam strength and water resistance, based on existing sewing methods for different thicknesses of fabric. On one hand, in-depth interviews with the factory owner revealed that the wet suit products are produced in bulk rather than in small quantities. Thus, in a practical sense, neoprene fabrics are stacked up and then cut altogether at once by an electric ban cutter. As shown Table 1, the cross section is not a diagonal line but rather a straight line. Therefore, to propose a proper sewing method based on the thickness of the neoprene fabric used in the wetsuit, two thick and thin neoprene fabrics were prepared as samples based on the general sewing method used with neoprene fabric described above. In addition, a straight stitch and overlock stitch et ac., the basic sewing method in garment construction, was used.
To determine the proper sewing method for neoprene fabric used in wetsuits, sewn specimens were fabricated using an additional special sewing method with seam sealing on two different thicknesses of neoprene fabric, and then the data are presented. The purpose of this study is to propose the most suitable sewing method for producing wetsuits by comparing the physical properties of the neoprene fabric, according to the respective sewing methods.
Sample preparation and analysis
Two thicknesses of neoprene fabric of 1.5 mm and 3 mm (abbreviated as 1.5 t and 3 t, respectively), which are used as materials for wetsuits, were purchased directly from the manufacturing plant. The sewing construction with neoprene fabrics was performed at a specialized sewing factory for wetsuits in April 2018. In response to a request for experimental sewing samples from a professional institution, samples were cut to 11 × 30 cm to create the A4 size (21 × 30), and two panels were overlapped and sewn. To measure seam strength and waterproofing, two sewing tests were performed five times using 10 sewing methods with both the 1.5 and the 3 t fabrics. Also, to examine the tensile strength and tensile elongation in the thread and in the warp and weft of the fabric, cuts were made at 50 cm * 50 cm for each of the 1.5 t and 3 t ends. Four experiments were conducted and a 100% polyester filament yarn commonly used in general wetsuit sewing operations was prepared. The data were obtained by subtracting the minimum and maximum values from the five samples of each sewing method on the 1.5 t and 3 t neoprene fabric. All quantitative data related to seam strength and water resistance were expressed as the mean and standard deviations (Mean ± S. D.). To analyze the sewing methods for the wetsuit using two thicknesses of neoprene fabric between 1.5 t and 3 t, a Wilcoxon signed rank t-test was performed. Also, to identify the effect of the seam sealing, a Wilcoxon signed rank t-test was performed between the sewing method that included attached seam sealing and that which did not. Thereafter, Spearman’s rank correlation for sewing strength, water resistance, fabric thickness, ventricular ringing, and the sewing method was calculated and multiple regression equations were obtained through regression analysis.
Table 2 shows the 10 sewing methods used in the sewing experiment to determine the seam strength and water resistance that are the most suitable for the wetsuits. They are as follows:
(1) Straight stitch (abbreviated as [S]), (2) overlock stitch (abbreviated as [O]), (3) flatlock stitch without an overlap (abbreviated as [F]), (4) flatlock stitch without an overlap and with seam sealing (abbreviated as [F(S)]), (5) flatlock stitch with an overlap (abbreviated as [FF]), (6) flatlock stitch with both an overlap and seam sealing (abbreviated as [FF(S)]), (7) zigzag stitch and flatlock stitch (abbreviated as [ZF]), (8) zigzag and flatlock stitch with seam sealing (abbreviated as [ZF(S)]), (9) glue and blind stitch (abbreviated as [GB]), (10) glue and blind stitch with seam sealing (abbreviated as [GB(S)]).
1. Straight stitch
The Straight stitch is used on the main machine in a sewing factory, but the neoprene fabric’s stretch is very good, so this sample was constructed with the manual application of gentle tension during sewing. In this study, a stitch count of eleven stitches per 1 inch was used.
2. Overlock stitching
The overlock stitch is used on the industrial sewing machines with which most general sewing factories are equipped. Therefore, if overlock stitches are used in wetsuits, they can be constructed in any sewing factory. However, a twofold portion of the seam remains; when wetsuits constructed with overlock stitch are worn, the portion constructed with the overlock stitch has the disadvantage of applying pressure to the skin.
3. Zigzag stitching
Zigzag stitches should be sewn flat on both sides of the panel without overlapping. The needle passes through the fabric and is sewn in the same zigzag pattern on both the front and back sides. When sewing with neoprene, the sewing surface has the appearance of having been embroidered on a single panel rather than on two panels. In this study, a STAGER SZ-21-5WN machine was used to create a seam allowance of 4 mm and a stitch count of five stitches per 1 inch. After the panel is sewn, it stretches when pulled in the direction parallel to the seam formed by the zigzag stitches, but when pulled in the direction that is perpendicular to the seam, the panel does not stretch. Zigzag stitches can vary in width and stitch count; thus, various zigzag stitches are possible depending on a particular panel pattern.
4. Flatlock stitch
The flatlock stitch can be sewn so that the seam of the fabric does not overlap using the method of seamless sewing that is typical of sports garments; alternatively, the two panels may be sewn with a small overlapping seam for additional strength. In this study, sewing methods included 3 kinds of flatlock stitch: (1) Flatlock stitching was performed, the seams did not overlap, and the stitching was seamless (Fig. 1a); the stitched surface had the appearance of a single piece of connected fabric. However, after sewing, when pulling the neoprene fabric in the horizontal direction of the seam, the flatlock stitch itself had excellent stretch, so the sewn portion gapped severely (Fig. 2); thus, when pressure was manually applied, the two panels spread further apart. Therefore, in this study, flatlock stitching is performed so the fabric is stitched firmly as a complement, (2) the point of contact for the two panels is overlapped by a seam of approximately 2 mm (Fig. 1b), and (3) the stitched surface does not overlap with the zigzag seam and a flatlock stitch is sewn without overlapping as well (Fig. 1c). In this study, the Kansai Special FSX 6604MH-DD-60 machine was used to produce a seam allowance of 7 mm and a stitch count of thirteen stitches per inch. The overlapping flatlock seam of 2 mm is sewn such that the overlapping portion is sewn with a flatlock stitch, resulting in a 2 mm overlapping flatlock stitch that joined the two sides securely and did not allow them to spread; however, the method used to sew the overlapping portion of the flatlock stitch was convex. When wetsuits are produced using such a sewing method, pressure is exerted on point of contact with the skin more than in wetsuits created by other sewing methods, which may cause the skin to stick to the stitching. Pressure may be applied to the area in contact with the body, which may cause the wearer’s skin to stick to the fabric. In addition, this method has another disadvantage as it is difficult to use small, detailed sewing panels because of the significant width required for construction, in comparison with other sewing methods. However, this method is advantageous when a sensible design such as embroidery is used, consisting of a thread count of four to six stitches and using threads of various colors.
5. Bond adhesive and blind stitch
To make a blind stitch for the exclusive use of neoprene, a loctite bondace 8800B bond, which can increase the adhesiveness of neoprene fabric, was used. Bonding is performed two or three times to ensure that the fabric absorbs enough of the bond. For the first bond, a large amount of bond is applied, then the second bond is applied using about 50% less bond than that used in the initial bond. Just before the bond is dry, the panels are attached to each side and painted by hand with the bond; the two sheets are gently glued together to form a single panel. In this study, we performed straight line sewing to fabricate the sewing test samples; however, in the actual production of wetsuits, the sewing should be contoured according to the surface of the human body. Therefore, it is considered that the bonding process required for each of these contoured sources is incompatible with the mass production process as it requires significant time and is physically taxing.
After the bond is dry, the seam is sewn with a blind stitch machine. Blind stitch sewing is affected by the thickness of the fabric. This means that very thin fabric is difficult to sew (Matsunashi and Shimazaki 2001). The 1.5 t fabric was relatively thin, so a more precise technique was needed. Since the blind stitch was sewn on only one side of the panel rather than by passing the needle through the fabric from the front to the back, it was necessary to sew a seam on both sides. This is disadvantageous in that it requires twice as much time and effort, as compared with other sewing methods. However, in the case of the blind stitch, since the needle does not pass from the face of the fabric to the back like other typical sewing methods, after sewing, one side of the fabric has no needle holes. In this study, a TREASURE BS-140 machine was used to create a 4 mm seam allowance and a stitch count of nine stitches per 1 inch.
6. Attachment of seam seal
The seam sealing tape has a width of 0.9–0.10 mm and is made of polyurethane; it is resistant to hot air 450–480 °C and pressure 0.8 kg/cm2 (Sealon and Seam sealing tape 2016). However, when the sealing tape is attached to the neoprene fabric, the air temperature must be lower than 300 °C and may not come into direct contact with the thread; otherwise, it may melt.
Sewing test method
1. Tensile strength
Tensile strength refers to the load applied to a fabric or thread when pulled in one axial direction and the extent to which it has been stretched. The tensile strength of the fabric and thread in this study was measured using the KSK 0520 method. In the tensile test, the sample was stretched at a constant speed of 50 mm/min (constant speed). A constant rate of load (C.R.E) type of tensile strength machine was used. The tensile speed of this experiment was 50 mm/min. The test was performed in a direction parallel to the sewing direction, and the grip distance was taken as 100 mm.
2. Seam strength
The seam strength is the maximum amount of tension l applied until the test piece tears following the application of a load in the perpendicular direction. The strength of the sewn seam was measured in the horizontal direction using the KSK 0530 method.
3. Water resistance (cmH2O)
Water resistance was measured using the KSK ISO 811 method; in this method, the resistance to leakage or immersion in water are examined to identify the point at which the water does not leak through to the other side, even when water pressure is applied to one side of the sample. The lab temperature was 20 ± 2 °C, the humidity was 65 ± 4% RH, the water temperature was 20 ± 2 °C, and the water pressure was increased at a rate of 60 cmH2O/min.
Result and discussion
Tensile strength of fabric and thread
Table 3 shows the tensile strength of each fabric The tensile strength of the wale direction was less than that of the course direction for both the 1.5 t and 3 t neoprene. Neoprene fabric comprises rubber bubbles. It has good stretch in both the warp and weft directions, but is affected by the fabric that covers the outer surface. Conversely, for tensile elongation, that of the course direction was less than that of the wale direction for both the 1.5 and 3 t neoprene fabric. The yarn used for the stitches was 100% polyester filament with an intrinsic strength (cN) of 1967.0, and a tensile strength (%) of 54.0.
Table 4 shows the average and standard deviation with Z following the results of the Wilcoxon signed rank t-test between F and F(S), FF and FF(S), ZF and ZZF(S), and GB and GB(S) related to attaching seam sealing and the samples of 1.5 t and 3 t sewn using each method. The test provides the results of five seam strength tests on samples constructed using 10 different sewing methods with each kind of fabric. For all sewing methods, the seam strength of samples constructed using 3 t was remarkably higher than that of those using 1.5 t. The highest mean value of the 1.5 t samples was 466.7 N in [ZF], and the lowest mean value was 113.3 N in [S]. The seam strength was high for samples of 1.5 t as follows: [O], [FF], [GB(S)], [FF(S)], [GB], [F(S)], [ZF(S)], and [S]. Except [S], all seam strengths were more than 390–430 N for all sewing methods using 1.5 t neoprene. However, the highest mean value of samples constructed using 3 t was 653.3 N in [ZF(S)] and the lowest mean value was 164.6 N in [S]. The seam strength was high for samples of 3 t as follows: [F(S)], [GB(S)], [FF(S)], [ZF], [GB], [O], [FF], [F], and [S]. Except [S], all seam strengths were more than 630 N for all sewing methods using 3 t neoprene. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference between F and F(S), FF and FF(S), ZF and ZZF(S), and GB and GB(S) in seam strength. This means that the strength was not affected by the attachment of the seam sealing tape. However, significant differences exist between the fabric thicknesses of 1.5 t and 3 t in terms of the sewing methods that should be used. Uh (2013) study shows the seam strength of the cotton fabric in the bias/bias direction (100′s plain weave: 219 N, twill weave: 220 N) was higher than in the warp direction (100′s plain weave: 208 N, twill weave: 148 N) and weft direction (100′s plain weave: 179 N, twill weave: 167 N). This study has shown that the same fabric can show an improvement in seam strength if the texture and cutting direction are changed. However, the neoprene fabric used in this study is a four-way stretch fabric that is not significantly affected by the cutting directions, such as the warp, weft, and bias. For each of the sewing methods used in this study, with the exception of the straight stitch sewing method, the seam strength of 1.5 t was 390 N and that of 3 t was more than 630 N. To identify the factors affecting seam strength, multiple regression was used to produce the equation as in (Eq. 1). As a result of the analysis, the total variance explained by the model as a whole was 50.5%, F = 51.475, p < 0.000. In the final model, only two factors were statistically significant; the thickness of the fabric revealed a higher beta value (beta = + 212.320, p < 0.000) than the sewing method (beta = + 17.178, p < 0.000). However, the attachment of seam sealing (beta = + 0.067) and water resistance (beta = − 0.072) did not affect seam strength.
Table 5 shows the average and standard deviation with Z after the Wilcoxon signed rank t-test was conducted between F and F(S), FF and FF(S), ZF and ZF(S), and GB and GB(S) regarding the attachment of seam sealing as well as 1.5 t and 3 t using each sewing method. In the results from the five tests of water resistance performed on samples sewn using each of the 10 sewing methods on both thicknesses of fabric, the difference in water resistance was significantly higher depending on whether the seam sealing was attached. The highest value for 1.5 t samples was 414.4 cmH2O from a [GB(S)] sample, while the lowest value was 14.4 cmH2O from a [ZF] sample. In addition, when the seam sealing was attached, all samples revealed water resistance of more than 150 cmH2O. Similar to the 1.5 t results, the highest water resistance value for 3 t was 987.6 cmH2O in a [GB(S)] sample; meanwhile, the lowest value of 13.3 cmH2O was revealed in the sample sewn with [O]. Second, the higher water resistance for 3 t was 595.6 cmH2O in a sample sewn with [GB]; the water resistance was higher even though seam sealing was not attached. Among the sewing methods performed on 3 t, the water resistance was higher than 100 cmH2O in samples constructed using [F(S)] and [FF(S)] with seam sealing attached. Meanwhile, significant differences were revealed depending on the presence or absence of seam sealing in samples constructed using [F] and [F(S)], [FF] and [FF(S)], [ZF] and [ZZF(S)], and [GB] and [GB(S)] for both fabric thicknesses.
Also, between the fabric thicknesses of 1.5 t and 3 t, there are significant differences for [S], [O], [FF (S)], [ZF (S)], [GB], and [GB(S)]. [GB(S)] has the highest water resistance because it is constructed by sewing blind stitches on both sides of the fabric after a bond is applied on the sewing surface, thus sealing the seam on one side. For this method, the sample is not sewn from the face of the fabric to the back. Therefore, [GB] has no needle holes passing through from the outside to the inside of the fabric; because there are no holes, less water passes through than that which may pass through samples constructed using other sewing techniques. Even [GB] has a very high water resistance when 3 t fabric is used, but the sample using 1.5 t had a low water resistance (as low as 50 cmH2O or less) due to the blind stitching technique. Blind stitch is used to sew thick fabric, but 1.5 t is thin, so the needle passed all the way through the fabric during sewing, leaving holes that resulted in low water resistance. The water resistance results of F(S), FF(S), and ZF(S) with attached seam sealing for 3 t were lower than those for 1.5 t. As is already known, when thick fabric is sewn, the shape of the core created by the tension of the sewing thread causes gaps in the seams of the thick fabric. Meanwhile, the [ZF] method entails the application of zigzag stitching followed by flatlock stitching, which results in the largest number of needle holes in the neoprene fabric following sample construction. Therefore, it is concluded that the water resistance of this sample is the lowest. Meanwhile, significant findings were revealed between [F] and [F(S)], [FF] and [FF(S)], [ZF] and [ZF(S)], and [GB] and [GB(S)] regarding water resistance. The water resistance of the sample using the sewing method combined with attached seam sealing was significantly higher than samples that did not have attached seam sealing. To identify the factors affecting water resistance, multiple regression was used to produce the equation (Eq. 2). Based on the analysis, the total variance explained by the model as a whole was 39.1%, F = 32.739, p < 0.000. In the final model, only two factors were statistically significant; whether seam sealing was attached (beta = + 130.286, p < 0.000) which had the highest beta value, and the sewing method (beta = + 49.949, p < 0.000). However, fabric thickness (beta = + 0.146) and seam strength (beta = + 0.040) were not affected by water resistance.
Relationship between seam strength and water resistance
The results of the Spearman rank correlation coefficient are shown in Fig. 3, which provides the relationship between the sewing strength and the water resistance of the sewing methods, fabric thickness, and the presence of a seam sealing. Figures 4, 5 and 6 show the scatter data between the seam strength and water resistance according to the fabric thickness, seam sealing attachment, and sewing method, respectively. The seam strength was positively correlated with fabric thickness (r = 0.710, p = 0.000) and sewing method (r = 0.268, p = 0.000). Water resistance was positively correlated with the attachment of seam sealing (r = 0.753, p = 0.000), the sewing method (r = 0.544, p = 0.000), and fabric thickness (r = 0.273, p = 0.014). From this result, seam strength is strongly affected by the fabric thickness, water resistance is strongly affected by the seam sealing, and both are affected by the sewing method. Also, the presence of a seam sealing was positively correlated with the sewing method (r = 0.426, p = 0.037). Therefore, it can be concluded that the seam strength, the water resistance, and presence of a seam sealing are affected by the sewing method; meanwhile, water resistance is affected by the presence of a seam sealing, the sewing method, and fabric thickness. In addition, seam strength is affected by the fabric thickness and the sewing method.
The result for the seam strength of ZF (466.7 N) was the highest in 1.5 t fabric while all other sewing methods showed seam strengths of approximately 400 N, except for 113.3 N in [S]. In addition, [ZF(S)] was the highest with 653.3 N in 3 t fabric, and other sewing methods were approximately 630 N, except [S], which revealed a result of 164.6 N. Seam strength was significantly different for the fabric thickness; the thicker the fabric, the greater the seam strength. The results of the regression analysis on seam strength showed that the fabric thickness and the sewing method were the significant factors. Conversely, results showed that the water resistance was the highest in samples constructed using [GB(S)] for both thicknesses of neoprene and revealed the following values: 1.5 t (414.4 mH2O) and 3 t (987.6 mH2O). The result showing the lowest water resistance was a sample constructed using [ZF] (14.4 mH2O) for 1.5 t and [O] (13.3 mH2O) for 3 t. There was a significant difference based on whether seam sealing was attached. If seam sealing was attached to the fabric, the water resistance was higher. The results of the regression analysis for water resistance showed that seam sealing and the sewing method were significant factors. However, in the samples with seam sealing, the 3 t samples had significantly lower values than those constructed with 1.5 t when the methods [F(S)], [FF(S)], and [ZF(S)] were used, except [GB(S)]. This is because the stitch does not pass through the face of the fabric to the back in the blind stitching process used for [GB] and [GB(S)]. However, even if seam sealing is attached to thicker fabric like that of 3 t, when the sewing thread is pulled and pressed, the shape of the seam becomes deformed; therefore, water leaks between the layers of fabric or through the holes made by the needle. Meanwhile, to increase the water resistance in a wetsuit, a seam sealing may be attached to prevent the suit from filling with water. Wetsuits with seam sealing prevent water from penetrating during use through the holes created by the needle. When a sewing surface with a seam sealing touches the skin, its texture is as smooth as that of a non-sewn surface. For example, in the case of [GB (S)], the sewing seam is hardened by the coat of bond, and its direct with the skin is an irritant. The seam sealing on such a bond can prevent irritation. In addition, when sewing [FF], a 2 mm overlapping seam is created, leaving behind a thick core, which may apply pressure to the skin that is different from that applied by the non-sewn side. At this point, the seam sealing can prevent irritation due to pressure from the thickness of the other side.
In the future, the results of this study on sewing methods for wetsuits will contribute to knowledge on seam strength and water resistance and the development of a new sewing method for these two variables. And I suggest further research projects about physical activities in wet suits that are wet and skin irritations that exist when wearing a wet suit that is wet.
Choi, J. H. (2011a). Development of the Men’s Scuba diving suit pattern by using 3D body-scanned data. Family and Environment Research.,49(4), 105–113.
Choi, J. H., & Jeong, J. A. (2009). Transactions: the production conditions and consumer satisfaction of men`s scuba diving suits. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles,33(11), 1683–1695.
Matsunashi, K., & Shimazaki, K. (2001). A Study on the Amount of Needle Penetration in Blind Stitch Sewing (Stitch Type 103). Journal of the Japan research association for textile end-uses,42(7), 461–468.
Nam, C., Dong, H., & Lee, Y. (2017). Factors influencing costumers’ purchase intention of green sportswear. Fashion and Textiles international journal of interdisciplinary Research.,4, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-017-0091-3.
HKO and SJP designed and carried out the experiments, analyzed the data as well as drafted the manuscript. KWO guided and helped experiment. Also, they commented in feedback and final format of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This research was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF)of Korea funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2017R1A2B4005315).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
The data sets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) granted funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No. NRF-2017R1A2B4005315).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Authors and Affiliations
Researcher, Fashionoid R & D Center, Industry-Academia Collaboration Foundation, Soongsil University, Seoul, 06978, Republic of Korea
Professor, Dept. of Fashion Design, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, 06974, Republic of Korea
Kyung Wha Oh
Professor, Dept. of Clothing and Fashion, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, 38541, Republic of Korea
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.